INdiana Systemic Thinking

February 5, 2008

Big Insurance: “and throw a little sand in there too…”

I don’t know if everyone will get the reference in the title, but I thought it was fitting.  In another example of Big Insurance trying to prop up their already fat bottom line, comes this from the Wall Street Journal’s Health Blog.  By the way, this is what happens when MBA’s make medical decisions instead of MDs.

Aetna is about to cut back on its coverage of a popular but expensive form of anesthesia for patients undergoing colonoscopies, the AP reports. Docs aren’t pleased.

Doctors say the fast-acting drug propofol makes colonoscopies more comfortable (or at least less uncomfortable). But its use often requires that an anesthesiologist be present, and boosts the cost of the procedure by $200 to $1,000. Insurers argue that “moderate sedation,” which combines painkillers and a sedative, works equally well for most patients and doesn’t require the presence of an additional specialist.

WellPoint cut back on its coverage of propofol a few years back. As of April 1, Aetna will pay for an anesthesiologist to be present during a colonoscopy only in cases where the patient would be at high risk without one. UnitedHealthcare covers propofol during colonoscopy, according to the AP.

Some gastroenterologists and anesthesiologists are working with lawyers to fight the change. “To the extent litigation is an option, we’re looking at all options,” said John Fanburg, counsel for the New Jersey State Society of Anesthesiologists and the New Jersey Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Society.

I have an idea, lets have the “insurers” who made this decision undergo the procedure the way they want everyone else to.  Wonder if that would change their mind. 🙂

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. thanks for your post

    Comment by medical — June 23, 2008 @ 2:04 pm | Reply

  2. I’ve had a colonoscopy without anesthesia. They won’t like it. But, they should have to get it that way. And, all gastroenterologists and anesthesiologists should have at least one that way also … so they can make arguments based on personal experience and not just professional opinion. And don’t forget their lawyers … and especially the insurance company lawyers.

    No … on second thought … all the insurance company people and lawyers should have rigid sigmoidoscopy.

    Comment by Earl — September 25, 2008 @ 5:01 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: